The articles’ aims are similar in their exploration

The trio rises, Islam is non the Solution (or the Problem) by Daniel Brumberg, Is There an Moslem Civilization? by Yilmaz Esmer, and The Clash of Civilizations? by Samuel Huntington present a take in at refinement as a sovereign factor, in particular the use of goods and services of an Moslem civilization, on a state of matteral and spherical level.The terms aims argon similar in their geographic expedition of what it means to be a Moslem civilization and the effects this is having and pass on widen to have economically, politically, and culturally for battalion residing in these countries and nearby.All of the writers, in the course of making and proving their hypotheses, move to define what it is to be a civilization. Civilization, as Samuel Huntington explains, is a cultural entity a civilization is thus the highest cultural grouping of pile and the broadest level of cultural identity peck have short of that which distinguishes humans from anformer(a)(pren ominal) species (24).Civilizations differ from each other on the lines of history, language, culture, tradition, and theology. In The Clash of Civilizations? Huntington takes a look at western civilizations in sexual relation to non-western civilizations, including but not limited to Muslim civilizations.Huntington states that it is his be inhabitf that civilization identity instead than national identity provide be of ever increasing richness and that the intimately important conflicts will occur on cultural fault lines (25). If you read the intelligence from the Middle East on some(prenominal) given day, you can easily implement Huntingtons ideas come to life. In Iraq, for instance, the biggest conflicts that without delay exist are not threats from other nations but instead from the inside, particularly along religious lines.Huntington practices in the main history as the springboard for his theories, noting the changes in Islamic and European countries (citing he avily Russia as an example).In Is There an Islamic Civilization? Yilmaz Esmer attempts to use past hypotheses and statistical numbers to maneuver the value indicators, which can define Islamic civilization. He notes in the beginning of his essay that a large majority of people in secular but Islamic-dominated countries will first position themselves as Moslem and then identify themselves by their nationhood. I found this very interesting, being an American. I imagine, if you asked any given group of U.S. citizens how they identify themselves, one of their first responses would be American and then their religious affiliation.In the course of the article Esmer is able to show through field Values Survey statistics that there are certain defining factors to Islam in connective with values.The most notable differences among Islamic nations and civilizations from non-Islamic nations and civilizations lie in gender equality and the importance of faith. As Huntington notes in his art icle, economic modernisation and social change weaken the nation state as a beginning of identity. In much of the world devotion has moved in to fill this spread head (26).Unlike Huntington and Esmers essays, Daniel Brumbergs essay Islam is not the Solution (or the Problem) does not concentrate on the definition of civilizations, namely Islamic, but rather explores how best the West can lock with Islamic civilizations and nations with a large Islamic base to explore republic and flood out the current autocracies that are the norm. One of the points I found the most interesting approximately Brumbergs essay was his exploration of the role identity plays in the bridge between democracy and the present autocracy of numerous Islamic countries. Islam faces a unique altercate in supporting a democracy.As he explains, barriers are so formidable that, for the foreseeable future, any effective engagement with Islamist will require dealing with activists, many of whom choose ideas profoundly at odds with U.S. notions of democracy and freedom (98). In some of these countries, religion is so imbedded in the political mannequin it seems almost impossible to extract it. Brumberg makes the circumstance for non-Islamic groups to develop a voice alongside (not instead of) the Islamic majority.From reading the three essays, I am able to pull out my own conclusions on Islamic civilization and the role it will play in world politics. I think it is patent that there is such a social function as Islamic civilization, as Esmers conclusion and Huntingtons history proves.As far-famed before, simply watch the tidings on any given night or check out the world news section and there is bound to be an article positive, negative, or neutral on the signs of Islamic civilization in the world. plainly all of the essays still leave me enquire whats next? Will, as Brumberg advocates, the Islamic states shed their autocracies and allow non-Islamic interest groups to gain a hold in governing these nations? Will the ideological breaks between civilizations face even bigger breaks within? whole kit and caboodle CitedBrumberg, Daniel. Islam is Not the Solution (or the Problem).Esmer, Yilmaz. Is There an Islamic Civilization?Huntington, Samuel P. The Clash of Civilizations?